HomeResearchBigger is better: Comparison of alternative devices for tension hemopneumothorax and pulseless electrical activity in a Yorkshire swine model.

Bigger is better: Comparison of alternative devices for tension hemopneumothorax and pulseless electrical activity in a Yorkshire swine model.

Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 83(6):1187–1194, DEC 2017

DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001684, PMID: 28885469

Issn Print: 2163-0755

Publication Date: 2017/12/01

Abstract Hemopneumothorax

BACKGROUND:

Tension pneumothorax is a cause of potentially preventable death in prehospital and battlefield settings and 14-gauge angiocatheter (14G AC) decompression remains the current treatment standard, despite its high incidence of failure. Traumatic pneumothorax is often associated with hemothorax, but 14G AC has no proven efficacy for associated hemothorax. We sought to compare the 14G AC to three alternative devices for treatment of tension hemopneumothorax (t-H/PTX) in a positive-pressure ventilation swine model.

METHODS:

Our tension model was modified to incorporate a persistent air leak and pleural blood. Tension physiology was achieved with escalating carbon dioxide insufflation via transdiaphragmatic trocar, and 10% estimated blood volume was instilled into each chest. Intervention was randomized between 14G AC, 10-gauge angiocatheter (10G AC), modified Veress-type needle (mVN), and 3-mm laparoscopic trocar (LT). After recovery, serial tension-induced pulseless electrical activity (PEA) events were induced and decompressed. Success of rescue, time to rescue, and physiologic data were recorded.

RESULTS:

One hundred ninety-five t-H/PTX and 88 PEA events were conducted in 25 swine. Laparoscopic trocar and 10G AC were more successful and had faster median time to rescue for t-H/PTX compared with 14G AC, whereas mVN performed comparably. Following PEA, 14G AC and mVN succeeded at rescue only 50% and 57% of the time, whereas 10G AC and LT had 100% success at return of spontaneous circulation. Time to successful return of circulation following PEA did not differ between devices; however, there was a noticeable difference in the rate of meaningful hemodynamic recovery following PEA favoring LT and 10G AC. There were no significant injuries noted.

CONCLUSIONS:

While mVN performed comparably to 14G AC, both have unacceptable failure rates. Ten-gauge AC and LT performed superiorly in both t-H/PTX and PEA. We believe there is now ample evidence supporting replacement of the 14G AC with 10G AC in current treatment recommendations.

2018-08-08T02:25:04+00:00August 8th, 2018|Research|